Categories


Authors

The Shell of Easter

Catch the tune. Change the lyrics. Make the tradition yours.

On Ä’ostre, the scattered family, and the holiday that belongs to all of us

Essay

The Shell of Easter

On Ä’ostre, the mother they removed, and the holiday that belongs to all of us

About 31% of the world is Christian. In America, until recently, that number was closer to 90%. Today it sits at 64% — and falling. In two generations, the country lost a quarter of its religious identity, and nobody quite knows what to do with the hole that left behind.

You can see it most clearly at the holidays. Christmas became Santa. Easter became the bunny. The explicitly religious framing quietly receded, and what remained — the eggs, the candy, the dressing up, the gathering — turned out to be surprisingly sturdy on its own. As if the celebration knew something the institution didn't.

Nobody seems to ask why those things survived. Or where they came from in the first place.

The name itself is the first clue. Easter doesn't come from any word meaning resurrection or passover or sacred. It comes, most likely, from Ēostre — a Germanic goddess of spring, of dawn, of the returning light. The eggs, the rabbits, the flowers — these aren't Christian inventions awkwardly attached to a Biblical event. They are far older. They belong to the turning of the earth. The body knows this. Even when the story changes, the rhythm remains.

We didn't secularize Easter. We returned it.

In most of the world, the holiday is called some variation of Pascha — linked to Passover, to sacrifice, to liberation. But in English and German, it kept an older name. Easter. Ostern. A name that points not to death but to dawn. To east. To the direction the sun rises. It survived for a reason.

Go further back and the trail leads to Egypt. The goddess Aset — known to the Greeks as Isis, written in hieroglyphs with the symbol of a throne — was the seat of power, the mother goddess, the Queen of Heaven. Her name, pronounced "eest," gives us the word east itself. She was the light of the rising sun. She was later absorbed into the figure of Mary, whose very name is an Egyptian word meaning beloved. These aren't coincidences. Trade routes documented via blue glass beads connect Egypt to the Middle East to Germanic Europe before 2,000 BC — long before Greece, long before Rome, long before the stories we were handed as the original ones.

The timing of Easter reflects this even more plainly. The first Sunday after the first full moon following the spring equinox. That's not theology. That's astronomy. It is a perfect balance of sun and moon, masculine and feminine, light returning after darkness — the same alignment ancient societies marked as the beginning of the new year, the moment of conception that would bring new life into the world nine months later, at the winter solstice, when the sun wins back the darkness. If you had a child born at the solstice, that child was considered extraordinary. Ready-made for victory over the dark.

Love creates life. That was the original Easter message. And it predates the gospels by thousands of years.

Here is what was quietly removed from the story: the mother. The original sacred family was not a father and a son. It was two parents and a child. A mother and a father and new life between them — the most ancient and universal image of creation there is. Isis and Osiris and Horus. The divine feminine, the divine masculine, and the child who carries both forward.

When the mother was removed from the story, something went with her. Not just a character, but a principle — that life requires partnership, that creation is relational, that the sacred is not singular and hierarchical but balanced and mutual.

We have the tools and the understanding now to restore that principle — not as theology, but as lived practice. The sacred family was never a fixed institution. It was always a commitment. Two parents and a child: now that might be a mother and father, two mothers, two fathers, chosen family, adoptive family, anyone who sees a child and says — I will protect this life. I will show up. I will choose love even when it is inconvenient, even when it is hard, even when nobody is watching.

As long as it is chosen freely. As long as it is honest. As long as it protects rather than possesses. We need more love in whatever form it takes — open, declared, without the rigid longing and repression that has caused so much unnecessary grief. Speak up. Step up. Let the love be real and let it be seen.

This is not a small thing. The capacity to change our behavior — to choose connection over isolation, honesty over performance, love over legacy — is one of the most remarkable things about us as a species. We have tools no generation before us has had. We can trace the roots of our stories all the way back, find what was changed and why, and decide for ourselves what to keep. We can preserve the capacity for life on this earth — not just ecologically but relationally. Not just in the forests and rivers but in our own families and kitchens and backyard tables.

This work is worth it. The blooming happens whether we notice it or not. But we are the only animal that can choose to gather around it. To mark it. To make it mean something for the people we love.

There is a certain kind of person — you know them when you meet one — who moves through the world with their feet in the mud and their head in the sky. Changemakers. People trying to save nature: not just the forests or the rivers or the species, but the whole damn thing. The relationship between all living things. The understanding that we are not above it, not its managers or its audience. We are simply another animal, tuned to the same rhythms that have governed every living thing since long before there were words for any of it.

The blooming happens with or without our permission. The light returns whether we mark it or not. But something in us has always wanted to mark it. That impulse is not primitive. It is the most human thing there is.

Forget everyone's advice about how to celebrate, what it should mean, whose version is correct. Everyone has to find their own way into nature, into the season, into the ritual. It is there waiting — offering quietude, connection, the particular peace of understanding that you are part of something that was here long before you and will continue long after.

No institution required. No invitation needed. No mother tongue erased, no goddess replaced, no family too small or too unconventional to deserve a table set in her honor.

Catch the tune. Change the lyrics. The shell cracked open a long time ago. What's inside was always yours.

—————

Victoria is the founder of Rational Body and the author of the forthcoming The Spark, a nonfiction exploration of the ancient roots of modern tradition.

Candy Shell Chocolate Eggs, Sugar-Free

0